Airport Terminal Lease
Klimek Wanted A Better Lease For City
By Jon A. Brake
City Commissioners Ed Klimek said he did not like the lease agreement
the City was about to sign with General
Aviation Training and Testing Service, Inc. located at the Manhattan
Airport.
The City Administration had placed the lease on the consent agenda which
is usual passed by the commission
without discussion. Klimek had asked that the item be placed on the
general agenda so the Commission could
look at the lease.
Klimek pointed out that the lease had three things which he did not agree with:
1. The City is receiving only $2,500 a year for the old terminal building. He thought it should be more.
2. The lease is to run for 20 years without a rate increase. He thought
the City should be able to raise the rent
5-10 years down the road.
3. The lease does not have a buy-out clause. Klimek thought the City should have the right to purchase the lease.
The Company provided the Commissioners with an Estimated Economic Influence
on the City of Manhattan. A
part of the estimate showed the company paid investors $338,000 last
year. Klimek said higher rents could come
from the money paid to the investors.
The vote to sign the lease as recommended by the City Administration
passed by a 3-2 margin. Klimek and
Karen McCulloh voted "no." Commissioners Bruce Snead, Carol Peak and
Mayor Roger Reitz voted "yes."
Here is the Memo given to the Commission:
CITY COMMISSION AGENDA MEMO
December 27, 1999
FROM: Kenneth A. Black, Airport Director
SUBJECT: Airport Lease Agreement — General Aviation Training and Testing Services, Inc.
PRESENTER: Kenneth A. Black, Airport Director
BACKGROUND
General Aviation Training and Testing Services, Inc (GATTS) has been
doing business on the Airport since July
1997. Their business services include advanced flight instruction and
on-line aviation testing. They employ six
people full time and the vast majority of their clients are from outside
Manhattan, Kansas. General Aviation
Training and Testing Services, Inc. advertises nationally in the Aircraft
Owners' and Pilots' Association
magazine, AOPA PILOT.
General Aviation Training and Testing Services, Inc. started their business
in the old passenger terminal and
they have expanded on two separate occasions as other tenants have
left the premises. General Aviation
Training and Testing Services, Inc. approached Airport Administration
about leasing the entire building late this
summer. At that point, they leased over 2/3 of the building and the
Riley County Law Enforcement Agency had a
separate agreement with the City for the use of the former Kansas Air
Center space.
The Riley County Law Enforcement Agency has been notified of the City's
plan to terminate the agreement with
them on or about January 1, 2000. The agreement with the Riley County
Law Enforcement Agency was on a
month-to-month basis. The Riley County Law Enforcement Agency has made
arrangements with General
Aviation Training and Testing Services, Inc. to remain on the premises
through March. The City of Manhattan
should be able to offer alternative workspace to the Riley County Law
Enforcement Agency in the north tower of
the stone hangar by mid-February. Long-term, the architect for the
Eureka Valley Fire Station is modifying the
station layout to include office space for the Riley County Law Enforcement
Agency.
DISCUSSION
The new lease agreement with General Aviation Training and Testing Services,
Inc. has been negotiated by the
City Attorney and Airport Administration with their attorney. Three
months of effort has been expended on this
agreement and City Administration believes that the agreement (see
Enclosure 1) should bear fruit for the City
and the Airport for several years to come.
This lease provides for the rental of the entire building on a long-term
basis. It also gives General Aviation
Training and Testing Services, Inc. an option for the use of approximately
10,000 sq. ft. of land on the south end
of the building. The essential elements of this lease agreement follow:
A building lease for approximately 4,300 sq. ft. of space.
Guaranteed access and 20 dedicated parking spaces with signage to be
provided by General Aviation Training
and Testing Services, Inc.
Primary lease term is 20 years with three 10-year option terms.
The City shall connect City water and sewer to the building within one year.
The City shall maintain the parking lot adjacent to the building.
The City conducted a code inspection which is attached to the agreement.
General Aviation Training and Testing
Services, Inc. will accept the building as is.
General Aviation Training and Testing Services, Inc. shall pay all utilities.
The annual rent is $2,500.00.
General Aviation Training and Testing Services, Inc. pays for all maintenance,
repairs, and capital
improvements.
General Aviation Training and Testing Services, Inc. maintains all landscaping adjacent to the building.
If more than 50% of the leased premises are destroyed after ¾
of the primary term or during the option terms,
then General Aviation Training and Testing Services, Inc. may rebuild
or terminate the lease.
The City conducted an asbestos inspection which is attached to the agreement.
General Aviation Training and
Testing Services, Inc. will accept the building as is.
General Aviation Training and Testing Services, Inc. may sub-lease the facility with the consent of the City.
General Aviation Training and Testing Services, Inc. shall have the
right of first refusal to meet any bona fide
written offer of sale on the same terms and conditions of such offer.
General Aviation Training and Testing Services, Inc. shall have the
option to expand its business activity onto
two parcels south of the building that encompass approximately 10,000
sq. ft.
City Administration has conducted an analysis of the lease terms for
this agreement versus the status quo
situation and programmed capital improvements. This analysis assumes
that all of the building is available for
rent in today's market at $5.50 per square foot per year. The first
part of the analysis addresses the potential
revenue from renting the facility at this rate over a twenty-year period
as shown below.
The second part of the analysis examines the benefit of the new lease
terms. These benefits include utility
expenses, maintenance expenses, and capital improvements that the City
of Manhattan should not have to
expend funds for during the term of the lease. The utility and maintenance
expenses are based upon 1998
expenditures in these areas. The projected capital improvements are
currently included in the 2000 û 2005
Capital Improvements Program as item AP01-0715P where $250,000 of the
$418,000 was intended to go towards
refurbishment of the building. The remaining $168,000 in this item
was intended for parking lot improvements on
the eastside of the Airport.
The third part of the analysis calculates future rents under the new lease terms.
The fourth and final part of the analysis compares the potential revenue
from a lease at the current rental rate to
the benefits plus future rents under the new lease terms.
The outcome of this analysis indicates that the City should benefit
from this lease arrangement with General
Aviation Training and Testing Services, Inc. The Airport Advisory Board
agrees with this assessment as shown
in Enclosure 2. City Administration also considers this analysis to
be a conservative one. It does not even
address the economic benefit of the services provided by General Aviation
Training and Testing Services, Inc.
The Economic Development potential of this business for the Airport
and the City of Manhattan is best
addressed by the owner and operator of General Aviation Training and
Testing Services, Inc. Mr. Dale Wolcott
will be present at this meeting to respond to any questions the Commissioners
may have.